The Rice Partnership Market Update April 2026
The Rice Partnership’s Chief Investment Officer, Orest Saikevych, and Portfolio Manager, Brian Tokuuke discuss first quarter market events.
The Rice Partnership’s Chief Investment Officer, Orest Saikevych, and Portfolio Manager, Brian Tokuuke discuss first quarter market events.
“You have one tool, it can’t do two things at once.”
– Jerome Powell, Current Federal Reserve Chair
First Quarter Summary
As predicted, 2026 is turning out to be another volatile year, with most markets falling in the first quarter.
Early Developments
After the capture of Venezuelan leader Maduro, tensions rose between US and Denmark over the future status of Greenland. The White House insisted on purchasing the territory while Copenhagen remained firm in its resolve to maintain control over the world’s largest island. While the situation is largely unresolved, both sides have agreed to negotiate a solution.
The AI situation has morphed from elevated capital expenditure worries by hyperscale companies like Oracle to entire industries (such as software) being severely disrupted. This argument is somewhat contradictory as both concerns cannot be true. In other words, if business models of industries are at risk, then the capex spending is showing results. This is indicative of a phenomenon in its early, rather than late stages.
Meanwhile, the future composition of the Federal Reserve Board remains undecided. With Chairman Powell’s term expiring May 15th, the President has nominated Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, as the new Chair. However, Mr. Warsh has yet to be confirmed by the Senate and several Senators are threatening to hold up the vote until a criminal investigation of Chair Powell is completed. To complicate matters further, Powell will remain as a Fed Governor even if his term ends and he has not indicated if he intends to stay. Additionally, the status of Governor Lisa Cook is still in the courts.
All of this will make it more difficult for the FOMC to reach consensus on interest rate policy, even though Warsh is leaning towards lowering the short-term Fed Funds rate. Although the Chair has the most influential vote on the Board, it still requires a majority vote to determine direction of monetary policy.
With these events occurring simultaneously, it appears the tariff dilemma has been placed on the back burner. In late February, the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) struck down nearly half of the Administration’s tariffs, prompting a temporary imposition of 10% tariffs with the option of an increase to 15%. Also, tariffs on specific industries such as steel, aluminum and autos were increased. The temporary levies will last until the end of July, at which time congressional action will be necessary for a more permanent solution.
Conflict in Iran
At the end of February, the US and Israel launched an aerial and naval bombardment of suspected Iranian nuclear facilities. The Administration’s stated goal of permanently disabling Iran’s nuclear program was amended to include the achievement of regime change. Tehran responded by drone and missile strikes against American military bases in the Persian Gulf, along with military and energy infrastructure in neighboring countries and Israeli military and civilian targets.
The situation escalated as liquified natural gas (LNG) plants in both Iran and Qatar were severely damaged. Additionally, supplies of oil going through the Strait of Hormuz (SOH) were effectively cut, with only ships friendly to the Iranian regime allowed to transit. In effect, about 20% of global oil and natural gas supply has been cut off.
The current state is extremely fluid, centering around a two-week ceasefire and reopening of the SOH. Negotiations on April 11th failed and the US has since launched a total blockade of the Strait. Although path forward is unclear, it is imperative that traffic through the SOH must be entirely restored to prevent the global economy from getting worse.
Beyond that, sticky issues such as Iranian nuclear enrichment and Israeli strikes against the Hezbollah in Lebanon remain to be decided. Regarding the global energy situation, the US is now a net energy exporter due to the advances in fracking technology. Countries in Asia and Europe unfortunately, are net energy importers continuing to be hurt by the supply shock.
The Outlook for the Second Quarter
TRP anticipated some of the current market volatility by adding energy stocks to portfolios early during the first quarter and adjusting international holdings to reflect longer term impact of higher energy prices. Here is the outlook for the next quarter.
The Rice Partnership’s Chief Investment Officer, Orest Saikevych, and Financial Planner and Research Analyst, Tyler Sanchez discuss the Iran Conflict and Global Markets.
The Rice Partnership’s Chief Investment Officer, Orest Saikevych, discusses the 2026 Market Outlook.
“Someone will always be getting richer than you. This is not a tragedy.”
– Charlie Munger, longtime partner of Warren Buffett
Fourth Quarter Summary
During the fourth quarter, financial markets exhibited volatile and uneven progress as the autumn months approached.
Overall, markets continued the volatility that characterized 2025 as a whole. It was a rocky but highly profitable year for most investors.
The Government Shutdown and Tariffs
A key theme of the quarter was the unprecedented 43-day government shutdown. The economic cost due to layoffs and other factors led to fears of a hit to real GDP growth. Contributing to the concern was the delay of critical economic reports, leaving policy makers in the dark about the state of the economy. It was not until December that the full economic picture emerged showing little change from September statistics. Employment continued in a “no hire, no fire” environment while inflation seemed to be trending lower.
Revenues from tariffs helped lower the nation’s trade deficit considerably, though their status is being tested before the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS). An adverse ruling could affect $133 billion out of approximately $271 billion in total tariff revenues. The Administration has already stated it has a “Plan B” to replace most of the lost funds, although implementation of the plan may take time.
Geopolitical Considerations
Global tensions simmered last year, with no major changes in the Ukraine-Russia war and Taiwan-China controversy. However, as 2026 dawns, new hot spots are appearing.
The U.S. captured and extradited Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro and his spouse in a daring military mission. The new acting President, Delcy Rodriguez, has agreed (with some reservations) to facilitate increased oil production and export to American refineries. President Trump is encouraging major U.S. oil companies to invest massively to upgrade Venezuela’s crumbling energy infrastructure. So far, however, the majors have been cautious, based on previous nationalizations of foreign oil assets by Caracas.
Iran is another hot spot as massive protests currently threaten the Islamic regime. There is a binary outcome scenario for oil, with one possibility a lifting of sanctions and a release of additional barrels. Another possibility would be a supply interruption and petroleum price increases. There are other repercussions, as both Russia and China are allies of Tehran.
More Fog with the Future of the Fed
Another “known unknown” is the future composition of the Federal Reserve Board. Officials at the White House have stated that a new Fed leader will be nominated by the end of January — one who likely favors lower short-term Fed Funds rates. There is also a Department of Justice investigation of Jerome Powell, which could have an impact if he stays on as a Fed governor when his term ends in May.
Still at issue is the status of Fed governor Lisa Cook, currently pending a decision by SCOTUS. If she is removed, observers believe her replacement will probably have a bias towards cutting rates. The future Fed Board members then, may likely reflect that bias.
There is also a push by the Administration to address elevated housing and credit costs through new policies. The details, however, are hazy at this time.
Current Status of the AI Trade
It appears that the market is beginning to differentiate Artificial Intelligence-related stocks as individual winners and losers, rather than as a group based on the latest headlines or sentiment. Winners appear to be companies spending funds out of current cash flow and earnings, while losers are firms that must borrow massively to finance their new technology. Other losers include areas such as software whose legacy businesses deemed to be at risk by AI.
Also, there is increasing evidence of AI usage by corporations, both internal and external. The AI phenomenon is now entering a new phase of development, rather than approaching its end. Of course, we are continuing to monitor red flags of the AI story that were highlighted in our October commentary. Fortunately, they are not present at this time.
The New Year Outlook